PDFDownload article

In September 2008, the U.S. government took control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two dominant entities in U.S. residential mortgage markets. The government placed Fannie and Freddie into a conservatorship, meant to be temporary to curtail the risk of financial contagion during the financial crisis, conserve the value of the companies, and return them to safe-and-sound condition. But as of mid-2020, the conservatorship persists. Fannie and Freddie together with other mortgage-finance institutions have been meeting several important goals over the past few years, arguably satisfying most households’ mortgage needs and, on balance, supporting financial stability. Even so, almost all policymakers, researchers, and industry advocates agree on the need to move to a system of mortgage finance in which the government plays a less direct role.

Jordan Rappaport reviews the current system of mortgage finance and analyzes the key issues policymakers face in reforming it, including what to do with Fannie and Freddie. Although policymakers have reached a rough consensus on several key issues, they disagree on the share of lending the government should backstop against widespread defaults and how many companies should have access to the backstop.

Publication information: Vol. 105, no. 2

DOI: 10.18651/ER/v105n2Rappaport

Author

Jordan Rappaport

Senior Economist

Jordan Rappaport is a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. He joined the Bank in 1999 following completing his Ph.D. in economics at Harvard University. J…